基于eDNA技术和形态学鉴定的抚仙湖浮游动物多样性比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1:安徽师范大学生态与环境学院,芜湖 241002 ,2:中国科学院大学中丹学院,北京 100049 ,3:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,湖泊与流域水安全全国重点实验室,南京 211135 ,4:中国科学院大学,北京 100049 ,5:中国科学院抚仙湖高原深水湖泊研究站,玉溪 652500 ,6:河北大学生命科学学院,保定 071002

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(32171535,32471626)和中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所自主部署科研项目(NIGLAS2022GS02)联合资助


Comparative study on the biodiversity of zooplankton in Lake Fuxian based on environmental DNA technology and morphological identification
Author:
Affiliation:

1:School of Ecology and Environment, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002 , P.R.China,2:Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 , P.R.China,3:State Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135 , P.R.China,4:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049 , P.R.China,5:The Fuxianhu Station of Plateau Deep Lake Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yuxi 652500 , P.R.China,6:School of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding 071002 , P.R.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    浮游动物是水生生态系统的重要组成部分,对外界干扰和水体环境变化敏感,监测其物种多样性和群落组成有助于理解生态系统动态变化,并为水质管理提供科学依据。近年来,环境DNA(eDNA)技术已广泛用于生物调查,但其与传统形态学鉴定在浮游动物多样性检测中的一致性和互补性仍不明确。为此,本研究于2014年和2015年对抚仙湖进行了2周年的季节性野外调查,比较eDNA技术和形态学鉴定在检测浮游动物物种多样性和群落组成上的异同。研究结果显示:(1)在对抚仙湖2014年和2015年的季节性周年监测中,基于线粒体细胞色素 c氧化酶Ⅰ(CytochromecOxidase Ⅰ,COI )基因高通量测序的eDNA技术与形态学鉴定检测到的浮游动物alpha多样性(物种丰富度和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数)变化趋势一致,验证了eDNA技术在野外季节性周年监测中的可行性;(2)与形态学鉴定相比,基于 COI 基因高通量测序的eDNA技术能够获得更多的物种数,但是eDNA技术能确定到属的轮虫物种数少于形态学鉴定;(3)两种方法均发现抚仙湖浮游动物群落结构组成具有时间衰减变化趋势,eDNA技术比形态学鉴定更能辨别出不同季节浮游动物群落组成间的差异。尽管eDNA技术在检测轮虫物种数和浮游动物生物量上存在局限,但其在检测浮游动物多样性和群落结构的季节性变动方面具有明显的优势。本研究利用野外周年监测样品,尝试将eDNA技术应用于湖泊浮游动物检测,发现基于 COI 基因的eDNA技术在浮游动物群落组成辨别中具有更高的分辨率,但在浮游动物多样性研究和水生态监测中推广该技术前需完善基因数据库。

    Abstract:

    Zooplankton is an important component of aquatic ecosystems, and is sensitive to external disturbances and changes in the water environment. Monitoring its species diversity and community composition can not only help us better understand the dynamics of lake ecosystems, but also provide a scientific basis for water quality management, which is of great significance for understanding lake ecosystems. In recent years, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding technology has been increasingly used in biological surveys. However, whether the results based on eDNA technology are in line with those obtained through traditional morphological identification for detecting zooplankton diversity in the field, remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a 2-year seasonal field survey in 2014 and 2015 in Lake Fuxian, aiming to compare the results obtained by eDNA technology and morphological identification in detecting the species diversity and community composition of zooplankton. The results showed that: (1) the eDNA metabarcoding technology based on high-throughput sequencing of mitochondrial CytochromecOxidase Ⅰ gene ( COI ) and morphological identification obtained the same seasonal trend of alpha diversity (species richness and Shannon-Wiener index) changes of zooplankton in Lake Fuxian during our 2-year period of field monitoring; (2) Compared to morphological identification, eDNA technology based on COI gene high-throughput sequencing could detect more species; though the number of rotifer species identified at the genus level was lower than that identified by morphological methods; (3) Both methods found that the zooplankton community structure in Lake Fuxian exhibited temporal decay trends, but eDNA technology was more effective than morphological identification in distinguishing seasonal differences in zooplankton community composition. Despite the limitations of eDNA technology in detecting rotifer species and zooplankton biomass, it has a clear advantage in detecting seasonal variations in zooplankton diversity and community structure.This study attempted to apply eDNA technology to zooplankton detection in lakes using field anniversary monitoring samples, and confirmed that COI based eDNA technology has higher resolution in the discrimination of zooplankton community composition, but its database needs to be improved before promoting eDNA technology in zooplankton diversity research and water ecology monitoring.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

任艺晨,范方威,席贻龙,陈非洲,李芸,丁家宁,高佳伟,顾于,李化炳.基于eDNA技术和形态学鉴定的抚仙湖浮游动物多样性比较.湖泊科学,2025,37(4):1140-1150. DOI:10.18307/2025.0407

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-04
  • 出版日期: 2025-07-06
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2