越冬水鸟功能群对栖息地景观格局变化的差异化响应:小型浅水湖泊湿地修复的生态效应
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

安徽大学资源与环境工程学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Differentiated Responses of Wintering Waterbird Functional Groups to Wetland Landscape Pattern Changes: Ecological Restoration Effects in a Small Shallow Lake
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, Key Program, Major Research Plan)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    湿地修复是遏制湖泊生态系统退化、恢复其生态功能的关键技术途径。通过提升水系连通性与优化景观格局,可显著提升水鸟栖息地质量。黄陂湖为长江中下游典型的小型浅水湖泊,历史上因围垦养殖等人为活动,导致景观破碎化加剧、生态功能持续退化。2023年6月至2024年6月,该区域开展了为期一年的湿地修复工程,但其生态效应尚未进行过系统评估。本研究以从水鸟功能群的角度,系统分析修复前后越冬水鸟群落动态,整合景观配置特征与组成结构,评估景观格局变化对水鸟群落的影响。研究结果表明:修复后湖泊湿地景观格局得到优化,越冬前期整体斑块密度下降48.93%、水域面积增加53.49%及泥滩斑块数量下降53.89%;越冬中期水域斑块数量下降71.31%;越冬后期植被聚合指数增加12.45%。水鸟功能群对景观格局变化产生了差异化响应,水域聚合指数提升促进捕食性潜水游禽(G1)种群数量增长;泥滩聚合指数提升有效增加了植食性游禽(G5)集群规模;而浅水聚合指数升高导致均质化,使依赖此类异质斑块的食底栖动物小型涉禽(G3)种群下降。广义加性模型(GAM)分析表明,斑块密度是影响G5动态变化的关键景观配置因子,水域面积和聚合指数是驱动潜水游禽与大型涉禽分布的主导因素。针对小型浅水湖泊湿地修复,建议通过增强水系连通、分阶段合理调控水位等措施优化景观格局,满足不同水鸟功能群越冬需求。本研究强调了湿地修复过程中构建异质生境镶嵌体对越冬水鸟保护的重要性,为长江中下游地区强人为干扰湿地的科学修复与水鸟栖息地保护提供理论支撑与实践依据。

    Abstract:

    Wetland restoration represents a key technical strategy for reversing lake ecosystem degradation and restoring ecological functions. By enhancing hydrological connectivity and optimizing landscape patterns, it can substantially improve habitat quality for waterbirds. Huangpi Lake is a small shallow lake in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain that has experienced severe landscape fragmentation and ecological degradation due to long-term anthropogenic disturbances such as aquaculture reclamation. The wetland restoration project was carried out in the study area between June 2023 and June 2024. However, a systematic assessment of its ecological impacts is still lacking. From the perspective of waterbird functional groups, this study systematically examined the dynamics of wintering waterbird communities before and after restoration, and evaluated the effects of landscape pattern changes on waterbird assemblages by integrating landscape configuration and composition. The results demonstrated that the landscape pattern of the lake wetland was substantially optimized following restoration. During the early wintering period, overall patch density decreased by 48.93%, water area expanded by 53.49%, and the number of mudflat patches declined by 53.89%; in the mid-wintering period, the number of water patches decreased by 71.31%; and in the late wintering period, the vegetation aggregation index increased by 12.45%. Waterbird functional groups showed differential responses to variations in landscape patterns. Increases in the water area aggregation index promoted population growth in predatory diving waterbirds (G1); higher mudflat aggregation index effectively increased colony size in herbivorous waterbirds (G5); whereas an elevated shallow-water aggregation index caused habitat homogenization, leading to population declines in small benthivorous waders (G3), which depend on such heterogeneous patches. Generalized Additive Model (GAM) analysis indicated that patch density represented the key landscape configuration factor governing the population dynamics of G5, whereas water area and aggregation index served as the dominant drivers shaping the distribution of diving waterbirds and large waders. To restore small shallow lake wetlands, landscape patterns should be optimized by enhancing hydrological connectivity and staged water level regulation to meet the wintering needs of different waterbird functional groups. This study highlights the importance of constructing heterogeneous habitat mosaics during wetland restoration for the effective conservation of wintering waterbirds, and provides theoretical support and practical implications for the scientific restoration of heavily human-disturbed wetlands and the protection of waterbird habitats in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-26
  • 最后修改日期:2026-06-03
  • 录用日期:2026-06-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2